Google to pay A$265 million (UK£130 m) in tax settlement with UK HMRC – critics say it’s too little – basis for future tax returns agreed

Reuters has reported “Google has agreed to pay 130 million pounds (A$265 m) in back taxes to Britain, prompting criticism from opposition lawmakers and campaigners who said the “derisory” figure smacked of a “sweetheart deal”. Google, now part of Alphabet Inc (GOOGL.O), has been under pressure in recent years over its practice of channeling most…

BEPS transparency progress: Australia signs agreement for automatic exchange of ‘Country-by-Country reports (CbC reports)

On 27 January 2016, the OECD announced that, as part of it’s member countries’ continuing efforts to boost transparency by multinational enterprises (MNEs), 31 countries[1] (including Australia) signed the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement (MCAA) for the automatic exchange of Country-by-Country reports. The signing ceremony marked an important milestone towards implementation of the OECD/G20 BEPS Project…

EU response to OEDC BEPS recommendations

On 28 January 2016, the European Commission issued a ‘Fact Sheet’ by way of press release, covering the EU’s response to the OECD ‘Base Erosion and Profit Shifting’ (BEPS) recommendation under it’s 15 ‘Action Points’. This Fact Sheet included the following table [though, I’ve added the equivalent Australian measures already in place which included the…

Kocharyan v FCT – taxpayer loses appeal about losses in forestry MIS investment – none of the technical appeal grounds upheld

The Full Federal Court has rejected a taxpayer’s appeal against the decision of Jessup J in January 2015 concerning amended assessments. The Federal Court (in Kocharyan v FCT [2015] FCA 13) had rejected all 3 of the taxpayer’s grounds of appeal. The Commissioner had originally denied the taxpayer deductions of close to $1m for the 2006 and 2007 years…

Normandy Finance Pty Ltd v FCT – Payments from Vanda Gould orchestrated overseas companies to resident companies were loans, not shams

The Federal Court has held that payments made from an overseas company to its Australian subsidiary and another related company were genuine loans and not shams, despite the Commissioner’s claims that the payments were sham transactions used by the controller of the companies to bring into Australia assets held for his benefit and that they…