John Morgan is a tax specialist lawyer of more than three decades experience now practicing at the Victorian Bar - w: www.FJMtax.com e: f.john.morgan@vicbar.com.au

Re Yazbek v FCT – taxpayers appeal AAT decision that dividends were not derived by the limited partnership they set up [21]

The taxpayers have appealed to the Federal Court against the decision in AAT Case [2014] AATA 423, Re Yazbek and FCT. In the case, the AAT dismissed applications from husband and wife taxpayers and found that they were each assessable on dividends of some id=”mce_marker”.8m that they did not return in their assessable income. In…

*FCT v Hunger Project Australia [2014] FCAFC 69 – Commissioner will not seek special leave to appeal to the High Court [20]

The Commissioner has announced that he will not seek special leave to appeal to the High Court against the Full Federal Court decision in FCT v Hunger Project Australia [2014] FCAFC 69. The Full Federal Court decision, which now stands, dismissed the Commissioner’s appeal and held that Hunger Project Australia (HPA) is a public benevolent…

*Re Moignard and FCT – Commissioner appeals against AAT decision that taxpayer was not presently entitled to vineyard proceeds [19]

The Commissioner has appealed to the Federal Court against the decision in AAT Case [2014] AATA 342, Re Moignard and FCT. The AAT had held that an individual taxpayer who was the controller of several trusts through which he operated a winemaking business, and who was also a beneficiary of the trusts, was not presently…

*Re Yazbek and FCT – Transfer of shares to partnership ineffective – taxpayers assessable on dividends [14]

The AAT has dismissed applications from husband and wife taxpayers and found that they were each assessable on dividends of some id=”mce_marker”.8m that they did not return in their assessable income. In doing so, the AAT dismissed the taxpayers’ argument that the shares in a family company that gave rise to the dividend income had…

*Re Ford and FCT – Car expenses for transporting equipment to work not deductible because there was a sufficient locker at work [13]

The AAT has held that a taxpayer was not entitled to a deduction for work-related car expenses to transport essential equipment from his home to his work. The taxpayer was a train guard for the Rail Corporation New South Wales. He had lodged an objection against his 2010 assessment (out of time but accepted by…