The ATO stirred up something of a hornets nest, in February 2022, when it released draft guidance material on the operation of some fairly draconian provisions in s100A of the 1936 Tax Act, originally directed at so called ‘trust stripping’ but which were drafted so widely as to become a danger to many (see related TT article). That ‘guidance’ material was a draft Ruling, Determination and Practical Compliance Guideline – TR 2022/D1, TD2022/D1, PCG 2022/D1 and TA 2022/1. Consultation was due to end on 29 April 2022, but on 5 May 2022, the ATO posted an update, to its website, announcing that it was extending this period of consultation, citing ‘significant interest’ generally and interest in making submissions. Interestingly, I can’t see what that later date is, when consultation will close. This update also seeks to give some comfort, to taxpayers, on what they think the provision does not do. That update is in the following terms.
Update on draft guidance on trust reimbursement agreements and unpaid present entitlements
The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) acknowledges there has been significant interest in its draft public advice and guidance relating to trust reimbursement agreements and unpaid present entitlements (also known as section 100A reimbursement agreements).
In response to the level of community interest, the ATO extended the public consultation period for the guidance, which ended on 29 April 2022.
ATO Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke said “the ATO is aware that the guidance – which has been long requested by the tax adviser community – has unsettled some in that community because it calls into question some practices which have been relatively longstanding”.
“The vast majority of small businesses operating through a trust are not operating in a way that will attract section 100A. A distribution to an adult child who has a low marginal tax rate will not attract section 100A where they simply receive or enjoy the benefit of their distribution”.
Ms Clarke clarified that the section can only apply where a distribution is made under an agreement where there will be a payment or other benefit provided to some other entity, that will typically have a higher tax rate than the beneficiary, where a purpose of that agreement is that someone will pay less income tax.
“For example, where a full-time student receives an entitlement from a trust under an arrangement where they agree to immediately gift the entitlement back to the trustee”.
“The ATO does not make law. We have not changed section 100A; 100A remains as it always has been. What we have done is publish what is at this stage draft guidance for consultation as to how we think the law applies,” Ms Clarke said.
“The ATO’s position is that if the beneficiary of the trust gets the benefit, 100A has no role to play. The ATO is not concerned about ordinary family trusts where the relevant family members benefit from the distributions”.
Similarly, Ms Clarke also noted that the ATO is not concerned when profits from the family business are distributed to members of the family who work in the management of the business and then that family member chooses to reinvest the profits in the business.
The ATO will not be pursuing taxpayers that entered into arrangements between 1 July 2014 and 30 June 2022 where, in good faith, they concluded that section 100A did not apply to them based on the previous 2014 guidance.
“I want to reassure the community – we won’t have a retrospective element. We stand by our 2014 guidance for this interim period,” Ms Clarke said.
The ATO will carefully consider all submissions received during the consultation period as it finalises the package of public advice and guidance. A compendium of our responses to the feedback will also be published.
The ATO thanks all contributors for feedback provided.
ATO website – Last modified: 05 May 2022
[Tax Month – May 2022 – Previous Month, 11.5.22]