On 15 June 2021, Scott Morrison and Boris Johnson (Scomo and Bojo) agreed on the core terms of an incredibly important Free Trade Agreement between Australia and the UK. The new Agreement will see consumers in both markets benefit from cheaper goods, while farmers, winemakers and young people looking to live abroad will have greater access to either country. This article looks at the opportunities this deal presents for businesses in both countries and what you need to do to capitalise on them.

See below for further details.

[Tax Month – June 2021]

 


 

New Free Trade Agreement with the UK – what does it mean for Australian businesses?

  • [Holding Redlich article dated 23 June 2021 – see their website]

On 15 June 2021, Scott Morrison and Boris Johnson agreed on the core elements of a free trade deal. Behind the ‘grip and grin’ of international politics, what does this mean for Australian and UK businesses?

Despite, or maybe because of, the rivalry between the two countries, Australia and Britain have far more in common than they might admit. They are certainly culturally much closer than Australia and China or the UK and the EU. Do they even need the artificial stimulus that a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) might bring? The answer is “yes”.

There are currently plenty of trade barriers between the two countries, as well as certain visa restrictions. Australia will never go back to the pre-1973 political proximity, but the gap can be narrowed slightly, and that appears to benefit business on both sides. Overall, the goal of the FTA will be to reduce barriers to the trade in goods and services and the movement of people between the two countries.

Australian wine, rice, swimwear, confectionery and certain primary produce will all become tariff-free in the UK. Australian businesses will be looking forward to such developments, given that the UK was Australia’s fifth-largest trading partner for goods in 2020 and the FTA is expected to result in 99 per cent of Australian goods becoming duty-free when sold into the UK. British car, whisky, ceramics and confectionery makers will benefit from the eradication of tariffs on their products, and Britain’s under-35s will be able to live and work in Australia visa-free.

Perhaps more significantly, cooperation on security, climate change and science will mean opportunities for people in the defence and green tech industries, as well as research and development generally in both countries.

For the UK, this deal is particularly significant because it is the first one negotiated from scratch since Brexit. The fact that it had to work, politically, played into Canberra’s hands somewhat. But, even so, the UK has not come out with a bad bargain.

The tariffs on Australian beef, sheep, sugar and dairy goods will be eliminated over 5-10 years. British farmers have been grumbling, understandably so, because UK farming techniques do not benefit from the same economies of scale that Australia’s have and they fear they cannot compete with Australian farm products. But they will be protected by a cap on tariff-free imports for 15 years. Australians will be unlikely to sympathise since they had to recalibrate their own agricultural sector in the 70s and 80s after the UK left them for the EU. Australian businesses should expect that UK farmers will increase their efforts to export to the rest of the world, including Australia.

Of course, any agreement on eliminating goods from a particular country leads to debates about what constitutes originating goods. If a spade has its handle made in Bulgaria and the blade made in Britain, is it a British product? Australian businesses are generally familiar with this legal wrangle, and UK businesses have been learning the rules of origin very fast since Brexit. There will be teething troubles, but the UK’s Department of International Trade and Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade offer free guidance, and lawyers or accountants can assist if the problem becomes difficult.

After the UK’s deal with Japan, a more focused version of the EU’s own deal with Japan, this new FTA with Australia is expected to help in Britain’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, one of the largest free trade areas in the world, and moreover, one without the political or legal baggage that made some Brits so upset with the EU.

The deal also has some more nebulous but potentially dramatic commitments on market access for services professionals and digital provisions. The UK was Australia’s third-largest services trading partner in 2020. If these changes come about, there could be substantial opportunities for the banking, finance and telecommunications sectors, although it remains to be seen how these will work in practice.

The next step in the development of the FTA is to finalise the text of the FTA around the remaining ‘non-core’ elements of the deal. Once agreed, each country will then implement the FTA through domestic legislation. Both countries are working to finalise negotiations as quickly as possible.

Implications

UK and Australian businesses should start to examine opportunities now, whether they sell goods or services, so that preparations can be made and businesses can capitalise on the FTA as soon as it is implemented. Businesses in sectors not mentioned above should also consider the opportunities presented, as there may be hidden opportunities for those in other sectors.

Holding Redlich has teamed up with UK law firm, Harrison Clark Rickerbys, to provide you with this update and monitor the development of the FTA. If you have any questions on how to capitalise on opportunities arising under the FTA, Holding Redlich and Harrison Clark Rickerbys can provide you with aligned answers in the UK and Australia.

Authors: Holding Redlich Partner, Nathan Cecil, and Harrison Clark Rickerbys Partner, Nicolas Groffman.

  • We would like to thank Nicolas for co-authoring this article for and on behalf of Harrison Clark Rickerbys.

Disclaimer
The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this article is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future.