Haritos v FCT – Appeal from $20m default assessment – lack of procedural fairness grounds “incompetent” (really seeking further merits review) [19]

The Federal Court has dismissed the taxpayers’ appeal from the decision in AAT Case [2013] AATA 112 in which the AAT found the taxpayers had failed to discharge the burden of proving that assessments raised by the Commissioner were excessive. The assessments were in respect of $20m deposited into the personal bank account of the…

*Blank v FCT – Amount received for termination of right to participate in profit plan assessable as income [17]

The Federal Court has held that a resident taxpayer, who was entitled to a deferred payment over 5 years of  USid=”mce_marker”60m following his retirement from a global international commodity trading businesses, was assessable on the payment as ordinary income in the income year in which the right to the payment arose. The payment to the taxpayer was…

*Task Technology Pty Ltd v FCT – Software licensing fees were royalties [15]

The Federal Court has held that licensing payments by an Australian distributor to a Canadian software supplier were royalties under the Australia/Canada DTA. The taxpayer is the Australian distributor of working papers software that was developed by a Canadian resident entity. The taxpayer pays annual fees to the Canadian company under its licensing arrangements with…

*FCT v Barossa Vines Ltd – ‘Promoter Penalties’ imposed for MIS “materially different” from product ruling [14]

The Federal Court has imposed civil penalties in relation to 2 mass-marketed managed investment schemes that were implemented in a way that was “materially different” from that described in ATO Product Rulings in contravention of s 290-50(2), Sch 1 of the TAA. Barossa Vines Ltd was the responsible entity of managed investment schemes conducting a viticultural business.…

*FCT v Fabig – High Court refused taxpayer leave to appeal decision of Full Federal Court that CGT ‘scrip for scrip’ relief was not available to her [13]

The High Court has refused a taxpayer special leave to appeal from the Full Federal Court decision in FCT v Fabig [2013] FCAFC 99. That decision involved 2 taxpayers, Matthew Dickinson and Janina Fabig. In that case, the Court had allowed the Commissioner’s appeal and held that the AAT, at first instance, had erred in finding…

*SCCASP Holdings as trustee for the H&R Super Fund v FCT – High Court refused taxpayers leave to appeal decision that capital gain was ‘special income’ [12]

The High Court on Fri 14.2.2014, refused the taxpayer’s application for special leave to appeal against the Full Federal Court decision in SCCASP Holdings as trustee for the H&R Super Fund v FCT [2013] FCAFC 45. The Full Federal Court had dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal from the decision in SCCASP Holdings as trustee for the…