North Australian Contracting Pty Ltd v CofT – No JobKeeper benefits because associated entities were not part of the same group and could not carry on the same business

On 16 February 2022, the AAT decided that a company was not entitled to JobKeeper payments, for 9 employees, for August 2020, as, on 1 July 2020, they were employed by a different, albeit associated, company which was not carrying on the same business as the applicant. The taxpayer’s position had, I think, more merit than might be evident, initially,…

Modernising Business Communications Bill introduced – allowing electronic execution of documents, sending documents etc.

The Government introduced the Treasury Laws Amendment (Modernising Business Communications) Bill 2022 into the House of Representatives on Thursday 17.2.2022. It will introduce what is termed a “global communications regime” for documents sent under the Corporations Act. Specially, Sch 1 of the Bill will amend the Corporations Act in relation to: signing and executing documents electronically; sending certain…

Bill introduced to allow the AAT to stay ATO collection proceedings whilst the AAT reviews the Commissioner’s objection decision

The Government introduced the Treasury Laws Amendment (Streamlining and Improving Economic Outcomes for Australians) Bill 2022, into the House of Reps on Thursday 17.2.2022. It proposes to implement measurers including, the AAT being able to stay ATO recovery proceedings, as part of an AAT review of the Commissioner’s objection decision (see related TT article). the TAA53…

Whiddon v CofT – Foreign source gain from share swap assessable as ordinary income for taxpayer who had become resident

On 10 February 2022, the AAT upheld the Commissioner’s assessment of a gain made on a complex arrangement from an exchange of shares and options, was assessable as ordinary income – as profit making arrangement or scheme. To  uphold the assessment, the AAT also had to find that the taxpayer was resident, in the relevant…

Perpetual Corporate Trust Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue –  student accommodation exempt from SA land transfer duty – 1 semester stays too short to be ‘residential’ (GST meaning adopted)

On 25 January 2022, the South Australian Supreme Court decided that purpose-built student accommodation facility was not used predominantly for residential purposes and therefore qualified for a stamp duty exemption. The Court used the GST case of Marana Holdings, to interpret ‘residential’ and ‘reside’ having some permanence or long-term nature. The facts were these. In September 2019…