Caratti v CofT – Taxpayers fail to get orders restraining the Commissioner from commencing recovery action – because taxpayers breached deed by not producing security in time

Two taxpayers (Caratti & Bazzo) have failed to convince the Federal Court that it should make orders preventing the Commissioner taking recovery action while their challenge to the tax assessments remained on foot. The taxpayers argued that the ATO was bound by the terms of a deed agreed by the parties under which the ATO…

DCT v Doyle – Taxpayer fails to stay recovery of $14m tax debt – merits of objections unclear and no extreme hardship (no defence as tax debts ‘conclusively payable under tax law)

A taxpayer has been unsuccessful in seeking a stay of proceedings brought by the ATO to recover a $14m tax liability pending a determination of the objections to the assessments. The facts were these. The taxpayer did not lodge income tax returns for the years ending 30 June 2008 to 30 June 2010 as she contended that she was…

Vic payroll tax: Nationwide Towing & Transport Pty Ltd v Comr of State Revenue – no payroll tax on payments to subcontractors, to provide ‘roadside assistance’ to stranded RACV members under the ‘relevant contractor’ provisions

The Victorian Supreme Court has held that payments, for ‘roadside assistance’, that RACV contracted out, to the Taxpayer, which it then subcontracted, were not subject to payroll tax, under the ‘relevant contractor’ provisions. In summary, the facts were these: The Royal Automobile Club of Victoria (RACV) provided ‘roadside assistance’ to its Roadside Members – with varying…

Ham v Tax Practitioners Board – The Court agreed with the AAT and TPB that it was correct not to re-register the former tax agent – not a ‘fit and proper person’ because of ‘actual dishonesty’ to a long standing client and friend, without remorse

The Federal Court has dismissed an applicant’s appeal against a decision to deny his tax agent registration renewal application on the basis that he was not a fit and proper person. The Applicant/Appellant/Former Tax Agent had been involved in legal action, in which equitable fraud was found to have occurred. The facts are recited at…

Mavris v CofT – AAT’s decision, partly infavour of the Taxpayer (on LCT) was not invalidated by his death after the hearing and submissions – no statutory basis and pointless

The AAT has decided that it had the jurisdiction to make a decision even though the applicant died before the publication of the decision. The taxpayer had been partially successful in avoiding ‘Luxury Car Tax’ (LCT) in the earlier decision of Mavris v CofT [2018] AATA 1825, and the Commissioner wanted to treat the decision…

Labor’s negative gearing restrictions – TTI digs into detail and reveals it applies to all investment types, but on an aggregate basis – total investment deductions capped at total investment income

On 8 Nov 18, The Tax Institute (TTI) issued a media release, providing detail about the Labor Party’s negative gearing restriction on investments. The bad news is that the proposed limitation on negative gearing deductions will apply to all investment types (not just real estate with a new constructions exemption). The good news is that this…

3Bears Childcare Centre Pty Ltd v DCT – Taxpayer sought to review Registrar’s decision not to set aside the ATO’s Statutory Demand but failed as the original application was too late

The Federal Court has dismissed an application by a company seeking to review a Registrar’s decision refusing to set aside a statutory demand to pay $538,685. The Statutory Demand had been issued the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (DCoT), in respect of liabilities claimed to be owing, for running balance account deficit debts and unpaid superannuation…

DCT v Morando – No stay order for $1.8m tax debt recovery against ‘bikie’ – despite gruelling facts the taxpayer did not put on sufficient evidence of objection merits or extreme hardship without stay

A taxpayer has been unsuccessful in seeking either an adjournment or stay order for matter involving a $1.8 million tax debt. The facts were these. The tax-related liabilities, the subject of this recovery action resulted from default assessments to the Taxpayer’s 2009 to 2014 tax years, based on an assets betterment approach. The Taxpayer was…

LCR 2018/9 – on ‘downsizer contributions’ to Superannuation Funds – 65+ owners of ‘main residences’ owned for 10 years, selling under post 30.6.18 contracts and making contributions up to $300k within 90 days of settling

On 7 November 2018, the Commissioner issued Law Companion Ruling: LCR 2018/9 on the application of the recently enacted ‘downsizer contributions’ to Superannuation Funds – being contributions of up to $300,000 from the sale of a persons (or their spouses) interest in a main residence. This measure was introduced in Schedule 2 to the Treasury Laws…