EU response to OEDC BEPS recommendations

On 28 January 2016, the European Commission issued a ‘Fact Sheet’ by way of press release, covering the EU’s response to the OECD ‘Base Erosion and Profit Shifting’ (BEPS) recommendation under it’s 15 ‘Action Points’. This Fact Sheet included the following table [though, I’ve added the equivalent Australian measures already in place which included the…

Kocharyan v FCT – taxpayer loses appeal about losses in forestry MIS investment – none of the technical appeal grounds upheld

The Full Federal Court has rejected a taxpayer’s appeal against the decision of Jessup J in January 2015 concerning amended assessments. The Federal Court (in Kocharyan v FCT [2015] FCA 13) had rejected all 3 of the taxpayer’s grounds of appeal. The Commissioner had originally denied the taxpayer deductions of close to $1m for the 2006 and 2007 years…

Normandy Finance Pty Ltd v FCT – Payments from Vanda Gould orchestrated overseas companies to resident companies were loans, not shams

The Federal Court has held that payments made from an overseas company to its Australian subsidiary and another related company were genuine loans and not shams, despite the Commissioner’s claims that the payments were sham transactions used by the controller of the companies to bring into Australia assets held for his benefit and that they…

Re Bhatti and FCT – Accountant’s work-related expenses largely disallowed

A senior accountant has been largely unsuccessful before the AAT in claiming deductions for work-related expenses, including home office, self-education and travel expenses in her 2012 and 2013 tax returns. The Commissioner disallowed various deductions and imposed an administrative penalty for failure to take reasonable care. The Commissioner partly allowed the taxpayer’s objection and, after…

Tech Mahindra Limited v FCT – taxpayer with P/E in Australia appeals decision that it is taxable on some of its services provided from India

The taxpayer has appealed to the Full Federal Court against the decision in Tech Mahindra Limited v FCT [2015] FCA 1082. In the case, the Federal Court held that a company resident in India and registered in Australia, and which carried out IT services for Australian clients both from its permanent establishment (PE) in Australia…