*Kelly v FCT – Assignment of partnership interest effective but no deduction for super contribution for non-executive director [24]

The ATO on Mon 28.7.2014, issued a Decision Impact Statement on the Full Federal Court’s decision in Kelly v FCT [2013] FCAFC 88. The case concerned whether certain interests in a partnership had been effectively and validly assigned to certain trustees, and whether a superannuation contribution for the directors of a corporate trustee was an…

Re Yazbek v FCT – taxpayers appeal AAT decision that dividends were not derived by the limited partnership they set up [21]

The taxpayers have appealed to the Federal Court against the decision in AAT Case [2014] AATA 423, Re Yazbek and FCT. In the case, the AAT dismissed applications from husband and wife taxpayers and found that they were each assessable on dividends of some id=”mce_marker”.8m that they did not return in their assessable income. In…

*FCT v Hunger Project Australia [2014] FCAFC 69 – Commissioner will not seek special leave to appeal to the High Court [20]

The Commissioner has announced that he will not seek special leave to appeal to the High Court against the Full Federal Court decision in FCT v Hunger Project Australia [2014] FCAFC 69. The Full Federal Court decision, which now stands, dismissed the Commissioner’s appeal and held that Hunger Project Australia (HPA) is a public benevolent…

*Re Moignard and FCT – Commissioner appeals against AAT decision that taxpayer was not presently entitled to vineyard proceeds [19]

The Commissioner has appealed to the Federal Court against the decision in AAT Case [2014] AATA 342, Re Moignard and FCT. The AAT had held that an individual taxpayer who was the controller of several trusts through which he operated a winemaking business, and who was also a beneficiary of the trusts, was not presently…