*Hancock & Anor v Rinehart & Ors – Trustee waived privilege on legal advice contained in accountants’ tax advice [22]

The NSW Supreme Court has ruled that a trustee of a family trust had waived her privilege on legal advice contained in tax advice provided by the trust’s accountants. The trustee claimed legal professional privilege (LPP) in relation to documents produced in answer to a subpoena served on the trust’s accountants who had provided tax…

*Re Schlottmann and FCT – Car and work-related expenses denied – except to extent of cents per km basis [21]

A taxpayer who claimed id=”mce_marker”0,104 for work-related car expenses and $6,497 for other work related expenses in his 2009-10 tax return, which the Commissioner disallowed, has been partly successful before the AAT – but only to the extent of being allowed car expenses totalling $3,150 under the cents per kilometre method based on 63 cents…

*Re Rasmussen and FCT – taxpayer faced serious hardship but this was not caused by having to pay the $30k of tax and relief was denied [20]

The AAT has affirmed the Commissioner’s decision refusing to release a taxpayer from his tax liability under s 340-5(3) of the TAA. The Tribunal heard that essentially due to the taxpayer’s wife’s illness, he had been increasingly required to care for her as well as their 2 teenage children, and that this combined with a lack…

*Re DBTL and Innovation Australia – Activities associated with deeper mining pits fail to qualify as R&D [19]

The AAT has denied all the applicant’s claims for R&D deductions in respect of the activities it carried out at its open-cut coal mine in NSW from January 2000 to 31 December 2005 despite the Industry Research and Development Board (the Board), in the matter before the AAT, accepting that some of the activities qualified as relevant R&D activities.…

*Re Keep and FCT- CGT exemption refused because evidence didn’t establish it became the ‘main residence’ as soon as practicable after completion etc. [18]

The AAT has affirmed the Commissioner’s decision denying a taxpayer’s claim for the CGT main residence exemption in relation to a disposal of a property. The taxpayer submitted that he had purchased the property in July 2002 with this then de facto partner. The construction of the house commenced in April 2004; however, his relationship with his then partner…

*Archer Capital 4A Pty Ltd as trustee for the Archer Capital Trust 4A v The Sage Group plc- (No 1) – No discovery for tax documents in Cayman Islands to prove tax advantage [16]

A company that is being sued in relation to the alleged breach of its contract to purchase shares in the business of another company has been unsuccessful in its interlocutory application to seek discovery of documents from the vendor company relating to the tax consequences of its subsequent sale of the shares to another purchaser…

*Hua Wang Bank Berhad v FCT (No 8) – Use of affidavits from previous litigation allowed [13]

The Federal Court has granted the Commissioner’s application to use the affidavits of several persons that had been served on the Commissioner in other tax proceedings that were ultimately settled in the Hua Wang Bank Berhad litigation. In finding that the circumstances were sufficiently “special” to grant the Commissioner’s application the Court took into account…