*Re Xu and FCT – Early access to SMSF money not a loan or complying with conditions of release, so taxpayer’s assessable on it with 25% penalty [56]

The AAT has upheld the Commissioner’s decision to include in a taxpayer’s assessable income money withdrawn from a self-managed super fund (SMSF) in breach of the payment standards in the SIS Regulations. The taxpayer had withdrawn from her SMSF 4 amounts totalling $62,500 to complete the purchase of a home after she had been made…

*New Regulation registered to amend ‘cashing restrictions’ to facilitate payment to ATO under its Div 96 or Div 135 ‘release authorities’ [55]

The Superannuation Legislation Amendment (2013 Measures No 2) Regulation 2013 was registered on Mon 16.12.2013] to amend the SIS Regs and RSA Regs to facilitate the release of superannuation amounts pursuant to a release authority to pay tax liabilities arising from certain superannuation contributions. From 1 July 2013, excess concessional contributions (ECCs) are included in an individual’s…

*Draft legislation released to increase the thresholds for lost/inactive member accounts for transfer to ATO: $2k to $4k on 31.12.15 and to $6k on 31.12.16 [54]

The Government on Mon 16.12.2013, released for consultation Exposure Draft – Tax and Superannuation Laws Amendment (2014 Measures No 2) Bill 2014, that proposes to increase the account balance threshold, above which lost and inactive superannuation accounts must be transferred to the Tax Office. Currently, small lost superannuation accounts with balances of less than $2,000…

*SMSF’s limited recourse borrowing arrangements can still infringe related trust prohibition at times requiring relief via ATO draft legislative instrument [53]

The ATO has advised that it has become aware of a number of issues regarding the application of the in-house asset exemption provided by s 71(8) of the SIS Act to an investment in a related trust held by an SMSF as a required part of a limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA). The ATO said the…

*Withdraw GST 2013/D2 which would have ruled moveable home estates are not commercial residential premises, accepting they are like caravan parks [51]

The ATO on Fri 20.12.2013, withdrew Draft GST Ruling GSTR 2013/D2 (Supplies made by an operator of a “moveable home estate”) following consideration of comments received over the course of the consultation period, which contended that moveable home estates are sufficiently similar to caravan parks for the purposes of para (f) of the definition of commercial…

*Mattress Innovations Pty Ltd v Suncorp Metway Insurance Limited – policy construction is that Sums Insured be paid out unreduced by Input tax credits [50]

The Qld Court of Appeal has held that an insurance company was required to pay the Sum Insured to the insured owner of a building that was destroyed by fire, and that amount was not to be reduced by any input tax credits to which the insured was entitled. The appellant leased a property it…

GST: married couple not a partnership, not carrying on an ‘enterprise’ in building a residential property for short-term letting, planting olives and no ITC [49]

The AAT has held that a married couple were not a partnership for GST purposes, were not carrying on an enterprise, and were not entitled to input tax credits claimed on various acquisitions, including in relation to a residential building, during the relevant period. The couple bought a rural property in 2006 and constructed a…

*Re Swanbat Pty Ltd and FCT – GST: recouping refund paid outside the 4-year limit not in the ‘net amount’ so amended assessments set aside as outside s8AAZN [47]

The AAT has set aside the Commissioner’s amended assessment in relation to a BAS for the period 1 April 2008 to 30 June 2008 and held that the taxpayer’s net amount for the quarter was zero. It did so on the basis that the amended assessment was excessive. The taxpayer company lodged a BAS for the period 1 April 2008 to…

Re VGGL and FCT – GST input tax credits denied re property development business through insufficient information and unrelated litigation [46]

The AAT has affirmed the Commissioner’s decision and denied a taxpayer input tax credits claimed in relation to a property development business for the period from September 2005 to September 2009. The taxpayer was a sole trader who operated a property development business. There were a number of issues before the Tribunal in relation to the input tax credits…