*DCT v Ekelmans & Ors – Final asset freezing orders postponed as they were “without legitimate purpose” until recovery process identified [44]

The Supreme Court of Victoria has held that asset freezing orders obtained by a Deputy Commissioner of Taxation were “without a legitimate purpose”. The Deputy Commissioner had brought proceedings under r 37A of the Supreme Court (General Civil Procedures) Rules 2005 (Vic) for freezing orders over assets to the approximate value of assessments issued to…

*Re Vision Intelligence Pty Ltd and FCT – R&D outgoing not incurred: taxpayer liable for 25% shortfall penalties [43]

The AAT has held the R&D expenditure claimed by a taxpayer was not incurred in the year ended 30 June 2009 and as such it affirmed the Commissioner’s decision to disallow the deduction and impose a shortfall penalty. The taxpayer was an Australian resident company operating in the engineering and software development surveillance industry. It had entered…

*Re Jakjoy Pty Ltd and FCT – CGT – properties used in ‘carrying on business’ of deriving rent not “active assets” – because of the ‘deriving rent’ exclusion [42]

The AAT has confirmed that the exclusion from the CGT small business concession in s 152-40(4)(e) of the ITAA 1997 for assets used “mainly to derive rent” applies (as intended) even if the assets are used in “carrying on a business” of a deriving rent. As a result, the AAT held that a range of commercial…

*Re Lambert and FCT – taxpayer’s plan to get negative gearing advantages through a discretionary trust fail [33]

The AAT has upheld the Commissioner’s decision to disallow the taxpayer’s claim for deductions for interest and bank fees of over id=”mce_marker”20,000 incurred [over 2 years] in relation to rental properties purchased by a family discretionary trust that had been set up for that purpose and of which he was the trustee. [The Taxpayer intended…

*Re Chowdary and FCT – Penalties imposed for failing to take reasonable care confirmed despite “honest mistake” [37]

The AAT (sitting as the Small Taxation Claims Tribunal) has confirmed the Commissioner’s decision to impose 25% shortfall penalties amounting to some id=”mce_marker”9,000 for “failing to take reasonable care” in respect of a taxpayer who, in completing his own tax returns over a 2-year period, claimed interest deductions of over $40,000 in respect of moneys…

*The Hunger Project Australia v FCT – Organisation that raises funds for charity in Australia a PBI for FBT purposes even though no direct relief in Australia [28]

The Federal Court has held that the Australian arm of a world-wide organisation operating out of the United States that aims at ending world hunger was a “public benevolent institution” (PBI) for the purposes of s 57A(1) of the FBTAA – with the result, that the provision of benefits to one of its employees was “exempt…