*FCT v Ludekens – Commissioner wins appeal – civil penalties apply to “promoters” of tax scheme [28]

The Full Federal Court has unanimously allowed the Commissioner’s appeal and held that 2 persons were “scheme promoters” in terms of Div 290 of the TAA and therefore were liable for civil penalties. The matter involved 2 men who were marketers (and investors) in a managed investment scheme for which Product Ruling PR 2006/8 (the “2006…

FCT v Fabig – CGT scrip-for-scrip rollover: Commissioner’s appeal allowed – participation not “available on substantially the same terms” [27]

In a decision handed down on Wed 28.8.2013, the Full Federal court allowed the Commissioner’s appeal and held that the AAT, at first instance in AAT Case [2013] AATA 25, Re Dickinson and FCT; AAT Case [2013] AATA 26, Re Fabig and FCT, had erred in finding that the CGT scrip-for-scrip roll-over relief was available…

Pratt Holdings Proprietary Limited v FCT (No 2) – Full Court dismisses further grounds re no deduction for mining losses and penalties [24]

Following the decision of the Full Federal Court in Pratt Holdings Proprietary Limited v FCT [2013] FCAFC 82 (see above), the Court has now addressed a range of further issues left until after the determination of the primary tax issue: including that the trial judge erred in law in finding that the taxpayer or its…

*Pratt Holdings Proprietary Limited v FCT – No deduction for transfer of losses under mining provisions – taxpayer loses appeal [23]

In a decision handed down on Fri 2.8.2013, the Full Federal Court dismissed an appeal by a taxpayer against an earlier decision which had held that the taxpayer was not entitled to deduct a loss transferred to it from a related joint venture company in respect of a project to explore certain mining exploration tenements.…