Yearly Archives: 2017

Re IOOF Holdings Limited v FCT – Taxpayer appeals to Federal Court from decision that it is not entitled to ‘rights to future income’ deductions under amended legislation [53]

The taxpayer has lodged a notice of appeal to the Federal Court against the decision in AAT Case [2013] AATA 239, Re IOOF Holdings Limited and FCT. In that case, the AAT confirmed that, for the purposes of undertaking its review of the Commissioner’s deemed disallowance of the taxpayer’s objection against the Commissioner’s failure to…

Re Purvis & Ors v FCT – Qantas pilots appeal AAT decision that ‘loss of [pilots’] licence insurance’ payments was assessable as an ETP [51]

The taxpayers have lodged a notice of appeal to the Federal Court against the decision in AAT Case [2013] AATA 58, Re Purvis & Ors and FCT. In that case, the AAT confirmed that lump sum payments made to former Qantas pilots under a “loss of licence insurance” scheme if they lost their pilots’ licences…

*FCT & Darling and Anor – Commissioner cannot use Family Court documents for tax purposes [48]

The Family Court of Australia has held that documents filed in a family court matter, which the Commissioner had been given permission to inspect and photocopy by the Court in relation to an audit of the parties for the income years 1991 to 2010, could not be used by the Commissioner for “collateral” tax purposes.…

*Resource Capital Fund III LP v FCT –Commissioner appeals decision that sale of miner’s shares by non-resident was not assessable to Full Federal Court [54]

The Commissioner has lodged a notice of appeal to the Full Federal Court against the decision of Edmonds J in Resource Capital Fund III LP v FCT [2013] FCA 363. In that case, the Federal Court allowed a taxpayer’s appeal and held that it was not assessable on a capital gain of $58m it made on…

Re Carter v FCT – taxpayer seeks an extension of time in which to appeal to the Federal Court from ATO ‘benchmark’ based assessments [52]

The taxpayer has sought an extension of time in which to lodge an appeal against the decision in AAT Case [2013] AATA 141, Re Carter and FCT. In that case, the AAT dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal against income tax and GST assessments that were based on the application of the ATO’s small business benchmarks following…

Wickenby judgments deleted by courts because of Suppression orders [50]

Suppression orders issued by the NSW Supreme Court have seen the following judgments deleted: Agius v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 119, NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, Ref No 794448. R v Agius (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 482, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Ref No 869106. R v Agius [2012] NSWSC 639, Supreme Court of…

*R v Sakovits – Jail sentences imposed on 2 company directors in dishonest tax avoidance case – 5 years with a minimum of 2.5 years [47]

Two taxpayers have been sentenced to jail terms by the NSW Supreme Court after being found guilty in February 2013 by a jury of dishonesty offences under s 29D and s 86 of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)  and under s 135.4(3) of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) for conspiring to defraud the Commonwealth in tax avoidance scheme. The…

*DCT v Chemical Trustee Limited (No 8) & Ors – Judgment for DCT of over $28m despite claims of abuse of process [40]

The Federal Court has given judgment for the Deputy Commissioner seeking to recover unpaid income tax from Chemical Trustee together with the shortfall interest charge and the general interest charge, totalling over $28m. (The matter relates to the ongoing litigation arising under ongoing Wickenby investigation and litigation). In giving judgment for the Commissioner, the Federal…

Re ZZGN and FCT – PRRT: deductibility of certain exploration expenditure [46]

In a 173-page decision concerning the deductibility of exploration expenditure under the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax Assessment Act 1987, the AAT has affirmed an objection decision by the Commissioner in part, to the extent he allowed the taxpayer a deduction for certain expenditure (Company C Billed Expenditure, Company A Direct Expenditure and Allocated Expenditure). The…

*Re Healy and FCT – Expenses incurred in annulling bankruptcy related to DPN not deductible [42]

The AAT has confirmed that accounting and legal expenses of over id=”mce_marker”00,000 incurred in connection with a former company director obtaining an annulment of his bankruptcy (which followed his failure to comply with a DPN) were not deductible under either s 8-1 or s 25-5 of the ITAA 1997. This was because the AAT found that the…