John Morgan is a tax specialist lawyer of more than three decades experience now practicing at the Victorian Bar - w: www.FJMtax.com e: f.john.morgan@vicbar.com.au

*Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited v Konza – Section 264 notices served on Australian bank, about clients of their Vanuatu subsidiaries, held to be valid [C5]

In a lengthy decision handed down on Fri 9.3.2012, the Federal Court has held that notices issued by the ATO under s 264 of the ITAA 1936 to Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited were valid. The bank had been issued with 2 notices requiring it to provide certain information about customers who have…

*Consolidated Media Holdings Limited v FCT – Appeal allowed: consideration for off-market share buy-back was a rebateable dividend [C4]

The Full Federal Court has unanimously overturned the decision at first instance in Consolidated Media Holdings Limited v FCT [2011] FCA 367 and held that an off-market share buy-back transaction did not generate a capital gain of some $400m to the taxpayer. It instead found that the consideration for the buy-back was not capital proceeds…

*FCT v Futuris Corporation Limited – Full Court confirms that Pt IVA does not apply to value shifting scheme – no tax benefit [C3]

The Full Federal Court has unanimously confirmed that Pt IVA did not apply to a tax benefit of $83m identified by the Commissioner in relation to a capital gain realised by a holding company on the sale of shares in one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Commissioner argued that the tax benefit arose under a…

Screen Australia v EME Productions No 1 Pty Ltd – AAT overruled Screen Aust and allowed EME a Producer tax offset affirmed on the basis that its film series was a ‘documentary’ which the Full Court affirmed [C2]

The Full Federal Court has dismissed Screen Australia’s appeal against an earlier AAT decision which held that a production company was entitled to a producer offset certificate under s 376-65 of the ITAA 1997 in respect of a film series designed to improve household management (called Lush House). The AAT had held the series was…

*FCT v Bargwanna – High Court finds charitable fund not entitled to be endorsed as a tax exempt entity as the trustees invested its funds in an interest off-set account linked to their own personal borrowings [C1]

In a decision handed down on Thur 29.3.2012, the High Court has allowed the Commissioner’s appeal and held that the taxpayer trustees’ administration of the Kalos Metron Charitable Trust had not complied with the requirement for tax exemption under s 50-60 of the ITAA 1997, because the fund was not “applied for the purposes for…

Loss carry-back regime and timeframe for reform proposals: ICAA expresses concern [A18]

The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia (the Institute) has recently written to the Treasurer expressing its concern with the timeframes associated with the proposed reforms being considered by the Government’s Business Tax Working Group. The Institute said a longer period of time is required for a more “deliberative consultation process” over the next few…