Vic: landholder duty provisions – OSR guidance released [84]

The Victorian Office of State Revenue (OSR) has released the following publications on the new landholder duty provisions which commenced operation on 1 July 2012: Duties Act Bulletin DUT 2/12 (Duties Act 2000 – Landholder provisions); Revenue Rulings: ▪          DA.055 (Obligations on making a relevant acquisition and calculation of duty); ▪          DA.056 (Acquisitions of interests…

Chamber of Commerce v Industry of WA (Inc) v Comr of State Revenue – WA payroll tax: promotion of commerce a charitable purpose, so exemption allowed [81]

The WA Chamber of Commerce and Industry (the taxpayer) has been successful before the WA State Administrative Tribunal in seeking a payroll tax exemption, on the basis that it came within the definition of a charitable body or organisation for the purposes of the Pay-roll Tax Assessment Act 2002 (WA). The Commissioner had refused the…

Ashleigh Developments Pty Ltd v Chief Comr of State Revenue (RD) – NSW land tax: property developer did not get primary production exemption [80]

The Appeal Panel of the NSW Administrative Decisions Tribunal has dismissed a taxpayer’s appeal and affirmed an earlier decision refusing the taxpayer’s claim for the primary production land tax exemption for the 2007 to 2010 land tax years. In 2006, the taxpayer purchased a block of land from a farmer. The evident purpose of the…

Comr of State Revenue v Australand Investments Pty Ltd – Vic land rich provisions apply differently to 2 similar transactions – depending on whether transitional provisions applied [79]

In a decision handed down on Fri 13.7.2012, the Victorian Court of Appeal, by majority, affirmed a decision made by the Victorian Supreme Court in favour of a taxpayer regarding the application of the “land rich provisions” under Ch 3 of the Duties Act 2000 (Vic) in relation to a stapling transaction in October 2005…

Roman Catholic Church Trust Corporation of the Archdiocese of Hobart v Comr of State Revenue – Tas stamp duty: transfer of school plant and equipment not a “gift” [78]

The Tasmanian Supreme Court has affirmed that a transfer of plant and equipment of a school to a taxpayer was not a “gift” and therefore denied the exemption under s 53(n)(i) of the Duties Act 2000 (Tas). The property was transferred by an incorporated association of the school to the taxpayer by way of a…